Search found 99 matches

by schoppenhauer
Sat Jun 13, 2009 5:19 pm
Forum: Common Lisp
Topic: Embedding PHP into Common Lisp
Replies: 2
Views: 4442

Re: Embedding PHP into Common Lisp

Hm. No, thats not what I am searching for (there is also a project called "cl-php", but its the same - just preprocessing). No, I really want to access PHP from Common Lisp. The Language itself. I.e. I want to call functions, etc. Well, there is some SAPI called "php-embed" which...
by schoppenhauer
Sat Jun 13, 2009 7:17 am
Forum: Common Lisp
Topic: Embedding PHP into Common Lisp
Replies: 2
Views: 4442

Embedding PHP into Common Lisp

There are ways to call Perl and Python from Common Lisp. Has somebody already tried to embed PHP into Common Lisp?

It has some Embedding-API, and it shouldnt be too hard (hopefully).
by schoppenhauer
Thu Jun 11, 2009 6:49 am
Forum: Common Lisp
Topic: Which HTTP Server?
Replies: 10
Views: 14298

Re: Which HTTP Server?

Yes, I'm looking at using a VPS - how small is too small for Huchentoot? 256? 512? or is more needed? Not Hunchentoot was the problem, but SBCL, ACL, CCL, etc., are reserving too much memory - and want a special part of the memory to optimize their memory-management. ECL and CLISP are better in tha...
by schoppenhauer
Wed Jun 10, 2009 6:27 pm
Forum: Common Lisp
Topic: Which HTTP Server?
Replies: 10
Views: 14298

Re: Which HTTP Server?

mod_lisp is more of a webserver-appserver comms protocol than it is a server in itself, so far as I understand it; very much the equivalent of connecting apache to tomcat via mod_jk. I would say it is even more equivalent to SCGI ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCGI ) (I wonder if Hunchentoot suppor...
by schoppenhauer
Thu May 28, 2009 5:44 am
Forum: Common Lisp
Topic: Montezuma 0.1.3 released
Replies: 2
Views: 4568

Re: Montezuma 0.1.3 released

Is there a reason why its called Montezuma?
by schoppenhauer
Mon Apr 13, 2009 5:38 pm
Forum: Common Lisp
Topic: A good criticism of the comon lisp language(?)
Replies: 16
Views: 27964

Re: A good criticism of the comon lisp language(?)

Recently, I kept finding myself using DO and friends in a unaesthetic manner and the rationale for LOOP clicked. Now I need to go learn LOOP. I'm realizing that the number of concepts in CL is beneficial. Personally i prefer iterate , which is better in a bunch of ways.(imo, i discussed in this thr...
by schoppenhauer
Thu Apr 09, 2009 4:03 pm
Forum: Common Lisp
Topic: A good criticism of the comon lisp language(?)
Replies: 16
Views: 27964

Re: A good criticism of the comon lisp language(?)

In http://ilc2009.scheming.org/node/7 problems are mentioned, but no solutions. I mean, what alternatives are there? Scheme? Clojure? NewLisp? I dont see that they are really much better in the end (maybe in single concepts, but not in general). Wouldnt it be the best way to say "ok, thats an o...
by schoppenhauer
Mon Apr 06, 2009 6:27 am
Forum: Common Lisp
Topic: Common Lisp Bloggers
Replies: 10
Views: 20230

Re: Common Lisp Bloggers

I have created a Yahoo Pipe Rss Feed for my Blogposts about Lisp. http://pipes.yahoo.com/pipes/pipe.run?_id=_gfbgqMi3hGIuwx33nBDOQ&_render=rss Unfortunately, wordpress only shows the Postings of the last 10 (?) Days in their feeds, so at the moment this feed is empty :roll: . And I also have ger...
by schoppenhauer
Sun Apr 05, 2009 1:59 pm
Forum: Common Lisp
Topic: Something wrong with imagemagick and cl-base64
Replies: 7
Views: 11193

Re: Something wrong with imagemagick and cl-base64

Thank you. I used lisp-magick. Modified my code: (defun stretched-base64-image (img) "Call ImageMagick to resize that file to 32x32." (lisp-magick:with-magick-wand (mywand) (lisp-magick::magick-read-image-blob mywand img) (lisp-magick::magick-resize-image mywand 32 32 #x00000000 1d0) (base...
by schoppenhauer
Fri Apr 03, 2009 5:26 am
Forum: Common Lisp
Topic: Something wrong with imagemagick and cl-base64
Replies: 7
Views: 11193

Re: Something wrong with imagemagick and cl-base64

Thank you. No, I dont think that it is good for this purpose, as it works only with strings. I cannot pass a byte-vector as input and grab a byte-vector as output. Actually I cannot even see how to easily patch the code for this purpose. I could try to use flexi-streams and convert the byte-vector t...