Search found 49 matches
- Tue Dec 23, 2008 5:43 pm
- Forum: The Lounge
- Topic: Best of Lisp 2008 Awards Nominations
- Replies: 4
- Views: 8488
Re: Best of Lisp 2008 Awards Nominations
I'd like to nominate JazzScheme as an interesting and exciting new contribution to Lisp, but it hasn't been publically released yet. Not quite sure what they're waiting for, but hopefully we'll see something soon.
- Wed Dec 03, 2008 5:20 pm
- Forum: The Lounge
- Topic: New to Lisp and some questions
- Replies: 11
- Views: 35462
Re: New to Lisp and some questions
The sound from lispbuilder-sdl-mixer is flakey on Windows as well. The only stable platform for sound seems to be Linux. I'm going to blame the SDL_mixer library. Heh, yes, I thought this might have a hand in the problem :) I can actually get an mp3 playing; something just dies when I try to shut t...
- Sat Nov 29, 2008 6:02 pm
- Forum: The Lounge
- Topic: New to Lisp and some questions
- Replies: 11
- Views: 35462
Re: New to Lisp and some questions
OTOH, with Lispbuilder-SDL (I just started using these bindings a couple days ago, and they seem good) you have all you need to write a game of some description. I've had a little trouble with it on my Mac (e.g. the audio code crashes in my simplest test programs for some reason, perhaps due to how...
- Mon Nov 03, 2008 4:18 pm
- Forum: The Lounge
- Topic: A LISP Interpreter that runs inside the browser
- Replies: 9
- Views: 17017
Re: A LISP Interpreter that runs inside the browser
What about image files then?christoph wrote:The base library will remain little for now, e.g., I have no intention to include file operations .
Right now, I am working on a graphics library that will hopefully make for interesting applications.
- Sat Nov 01, 2008 7:59 am
- Forum: Common Lisp
- Topic: Lisp and Regex
- Replies: 7
- Views: 14771
Re: Lisp and Regex
Thanks guys, this makes sense
- Fri Oct 31, 2008 1:28 pm
- Forum: Common Lisp
- Topic: Lisp and Regex
- Replies: 7
- Views: 14771
Re: Lisp and Regex
Does that mean they're more flexible than normal regular expressions - they can classify context-free/sensitive languages?metageek wrote:Perl's regular expressions are not regular expressions in the formal sense. This means that they cannot be implemented be implemented by finite state machines
- Mon Oct 27, 2008 3:03 am
- Forum: Common Lisp
- Topic: lisp program error
- Replies: 8
- Views: 20023
Re: lisp program error
Ahh, we can do that? I wanted that a couple of days ago and ended up writing "(if (not (null ...)))", which smells. Funny, I used to use "if(x)" in C/C++ quite often.Paul Donnelly wrote:(if x ...
- Sun Oct 26, 2008 3:47 pm
- Forum: Common Lisp
- Topic: lisp program error
- Replies: 8
- Views: 20023
Re: lisp program error
Hi, in your code you have: (CONS ((CAR X) (incr (CDR X) 1))) CONS takes two arguments, but you've wrapped them up as one (a common mistake when coming from a function(arg1, arg2)-style language, and one I make as well): (CONS (CAR X) (incr (CDR X) 1)) With that removed I can compile and call the fun...
- Sat Oct 25, 2008 8:23 am
- Forum: Common Lisp
- Topic: How can I rewrite the function APPLY without using APPLY?
- Replies: 12
- Views: 26386
Re: How can I rewrite the function APPLY without using APPLY?
The real apply in SBCL is defined somewhere else. AFAIK, it should be defined in sb-imp package. I'm not familiar with sbcl internals, so I might be wrong. I had a look for all definitions of apply, but haven't found another one yet (there's a %apply and interpreted-apply or something, but they see...
- Sat Oct 25, 2008 4:29 am
- Forum: Common Lisp
- Topic: How can I rewrite the function APPLY without using APPLY?
- Replies: 12
- Views: 26386
Re: How can I rewrite the function APPLY without using APPLY?
Only the compiler knows how to call the function (because function is usually compiled to byte code or machine code), so it is not possible to write apply in CL. I had a quick look at the SBCL source and found apply in eval.lisp , line 279 - search for "defun apply". :) Note however the c...