Now taking a final run at the final goalpost! If $16k funding is reached, it's time to kiss the big compiler lock goodbye.
Again, Thank You Everyone,
-- Nikodemus
Search found 7 matches
- Sun Aug 28, 2011 7:01 am
- Forum: Common Lisp
- Topic: SBCL Crowdfunding at IndieGoGo
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5054
- Sat Aug 13, 2011 3:46 am
- Forum: Common Lisp
- Topic: SBCL Crowdfunding at IndieGoGo
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5054
Introducing MADEIRA (Re: SBCL Crowdfunding at IndieGoGo)
So, the campaign has been a roaring success -- all initial goalposts have been hit in 3 days out of 19. This means it was time for a new goal. If the campaign reaches $12k, in addition to the SBCL specific work I will also implement Madeira, a new portability layer for Common Lisp implementations , ...
- Wed Aug 10, 2011 10:46 am
- Forum: Common Lisp
- Topic: SBCL Crowdfunding at IndieGoGo
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5054
SBCL Crowdfunding at IndieGoGo
(I hope this doesn't violate any forum rules.)
Hi,
I have an SBCL crowdfunding campaign up at IndieGoGo. If you use SBCL, go take a look.
Cheers,
-- Nikodemus
Hi,
I have an SBCL crowdfunding campaign up at IndieGoGo. If you use SBCL, go take a look.
Cheers,
-- Nikodemus
- Sun Aug 17, 2008 6:22 am
- Forum: Common Lisp
- Topic: Macro expansion, packages, and LET
- Replies: 9
- Views: 18962
Re: Macro expansion, packages, and LET
We just look at the current package (current at the time of macroexpansion), intern a symbol with name "ADD-SLICE" into it, and the substitute the symbol into the macroexpanded code. That is fairly horrible: interning symbols into a package you don't own is almost always wrong. What if th...
- Fri Aug 01, 2008 4:59 am
- Forum: Common Lisp
- Topic: define-compiler-macro
- Replies: 11
- Views: 29598
Re: define-compiler-macro
yes, i know that ... but then there is no huge impact in real programs if you can only optimize literal arguments ? Nope. For example, SBCL uses a compiler-macro to optimize MAKE-INSTANCE when the class argument and all the keywords (not keyword argument values) are constant. There are many, many k...
- Sat Jul 26, 2008 1:29 am
- Forum: Common Lisp
- Topic: Does Common Lisp need a better type system?
- Replies: 14
- Views: 36736
Re: Does Common Lisp need a better type system?
I've always wished that CL had at least an option for compile time type checking. Maybe one of the commercial implementations have something. Hm, what's this then? CL-USER> (defun foo (x) (declare (string x)) (setf x (list x))) ; in: LAMBDA NIL ; (SETF X (LIST X)) ; --> SETQ ; ==> ; (THE #<SB-KERNE...
- Fri Jul 04, 2008 8:52 am
- Forum: Common Lisp
- Topic: 64 Bit SBCL under Windows
- Replies: 10
- Views: 32678
Re: 64 Bit SBCL under Windows
This
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.ste ... evel/10686
patch may be of use to you. (It's likely to be merged to CVS soonish.)
Cheers,
-- Nikodemus Siivola
PS. I don't regularly read these forums, so I am unlikely to see any responses on this thread.
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.ste ... evel/10686
patch may be of use to you. (It's likely to be merged to CVS soonish.)
Cheers,
-- Nikodemus Siivola
PS. I don't regularly read these forums, so I am unlikely to see any responses on this thread.